News and Articles

NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS OFFER CRITICAL INSIGHT INTO DRAFTING EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS

Yogi Patel - Friday, December 16, 2016

The groundbreaking work of Oliver Hart of Harvard University and Bengt Holmstrom of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which includes providing invaluable insight into how employment contracts should be structured, recently earned the two professors the 2016 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science. Hart and Holmstrom’s research offers a variety of theoretical models and frameworks through which they analyze the competing interests of employees, managers, CEOs, shareholders, and others, and attempt to reconcile them via contracts.

Over the past few decades, Homstrom and Hart’s findings have been used to evaluate whether particular contracts accurately measure the performance and value of employees and other agents to companies while offering the right amount of incentive. Specific factors that the research contemplates in its assessment of employment contracts include ownership, control, the measurability of an agent’s performance, risk sharing, and the motivations of the parties involved.

Rather than simply pay an individual a fixed salary or reward a manager for the performance of a company in a vacuum, the professors suggest considering alternative compensation structures and contracting terms, including:

Deferred Compensation

In order to ensure that a company’s interests are aligned with those of an employee, it may make sense to tie an individual’s compensation to performance rather than pay her a set amount. By withholding a portion of an employee’s compensation, the company can provide incentives for the individual to earn the full amount by meeting certain goals. Whether or not this type of arrangement makes sense will depend in great part on the measurability of an employee’s performance and the stability of the business environment.

Performance Evaluation based on the Overall Market

Another metric for evaluating an employee’s value, particularly one who is in a decision-making position, is the overall performance of the company. One common mistake businesses make is setting goals or targets based solely on the absolute performance of the company, rather than taking into account the performance of the company as compared to other similarly situated businesses. If a company does well in a thriving market or suffers during a market collapse, the employee should not be rewarded for good luck or punished for misfortune. A company performing well relative to others is a far superior measurement of employee value.

Designation of a Main Decision-Maker

Most contracts cannot contemplate the exact outcome of every situation that may arise in a given relationship. Companies recognize that it is impossible to list specific instructions for every job responsibility, and this in turn may actually be counterproductive. In such cases, the parties should determine who has the power to decide what to do in situations where they cannot reach an agreement. In this manner, the parties are able to avoid having to anticipate every possible future event while entering into a relationship that allows them to move forward with their main, general purpose, i.e. employment.

While Hart and Holmstrom’s work is highly theoretical and informative, it is essential to use their tools in conjunction with a business’s specific needs. Depending on the business type, number of employees, and variety of other factors, businesses may have widely different terms and compensation structures that work best for them. Notwithstanding this, business owners are advised to consider the research finds of Professor Hart and Holstrom’s when making decisions about their own employees and businesses.

This article was prepared with the assistance of Julie Lee, 3L (CUNY School of Law).

 

Trackback Link
http://www.lloydpatel.com/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=13375&PostID=939792&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.

Recent Posts


Tags

Fair Labor Standards Act Trademark Law Westchester County implementing new leave laws Wage Theft Protection Act New York Earned Sick Time Act Interns NYC Human Right's Law's Overtime Exemptions Emergency Economic Injury Grants Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. stocks Unionization Workplace Requirements NYC Sick Leave Law Trade Secrets Act Selling Business National Labor Relations Board Plastic Bag Ban EEOC Filing Requirement LinkedIn NLRB Right to Unionize U.S. Department of Labor Browning-Ferris Case Independent Contractor Employee Manuals and Policies Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order Federal Contractors Divorce Freelance Isn't Free NY payroll law Transgender protections Health Care National Labor Relations Act Federal Small Business Assistance Household Employees Housing Law Start-up Ventures Paid Family Leave federal Department of Labor sexual harassment training NQSO Fair Work Week Legislation Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) marijuana usage Mandatory Class Action Waivers Tax-Deferred Savings Privacy Hairstyle Discrimination Employment Law ACA Security New Address Nobel Prize Department of Labor Employee Salary Histories Fair Play to Pay Act COVID-19 Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws Salary History Inquiries Federal Overtime Law Credit History Out-of-State LLC Owners Real Estate Law employment discrimination lawsuits Immigration Status Webinar Affordable Care Act Sexual Harassment Criminal Record Employment Contracts Domain Name Firm Announcements Public-Sector Union Fees commuter benefits #meToo New York City Human Rights Law Employer Mandate Newsletter Unions Technology Facebook Privacy and Litigation Paycheck Protection Program Alter-Ego Doctrine Employment Offer/Agreement Corporate Law Executive Severance Credit Joint-Employer Relationship NYC Sexual harrassment law entrepreneur Wage and Hour Law Trade Secrets Nanny Audit I-9 Verification graduate students Prenup Federal Joint Employer Rule Fair Chance Act Lactation Law Postnup Human Rights Law Overtime Rules Sexual Harassment policy Arbitration Agreements $15 Minimum Wage Business Marijuana Testing NYC Salary History Law Minimum wage Payroll Scams Web Domains Internet Law Non-Qualified Stock Options Business Law drug testing workplace discrimination Negotiating Landlord-Tenant Law Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Trademark licensing Pregnancy Interview Series Executive Negotiation Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council Credit Checks Intellectual Property Worker's Rights Womens Rights Families First Coronavirus Response Act Fair Workweek Law AirBnB Illegal rentals Attracting Investment Apple vs. FBI Interns as Employees Sexual Harassment and Discrimination In The Workplace Economic Injury Disaster Loans Ban the Box

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.