News and Articles

New York City Bans Credit Checks By Employers

Yogi Patel - Tuesday, September 08, 2015

On May 6, 2015, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law a general ban on employers from using or requesting the credit history of their employees or prospective employees. Local Law 37, which goes into effect September 3, 2015 as part of New York City Human Rights Law, specifically prohibits most employers with four or more employees from requesting or using an applicant or employees credit history for employment purposes. Employers may also not use the credit history of an applicant or employee to discriminate against her when it comes to hiring, compensation, or the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. There are several exceptions to the prohibition, but employees and applicants should know their rights, and employers should take care to know their obligations as promulgated by the new law.

Local Law 37 adds language to Sections 8-102 and 8-107 of the administrative code of the city of New York, which incorporates the new prohibitions into New York City Human Rights Law and grants victims of credit discrimination its protections. Local Law 37 states:

[I]t shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or agent thereof to request or use for employment purposes the consumer credit history of an applicant for employment or employee, or otherwise discriminate against an applicant or employee with regard to hiring, compensation, or the terms, conditions or privileges of employment based on the consumer credit history of the applicant or employee.

The law defines “consumer credit history” to include “an individual’s credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, or payment history, as indicated by (a) a consumer credit report; (b) credit score; or (c) information an employer obtains directly from the individual” regarding credit accounts, missed payments, collections, bankruptcies, judgments, or liens. Any written report or other communication made by a consumer-reporting agency bearing consumer credit information is considered a consumer credit report under the new law.

Exceptions to the new ban include:

-Jobs in the securities industry;

-Police and peace officers;

-Jobs that require a federal or state security clearance;

-Non-clerical positions that have access to trade secrets, intelligence information, or national security information;

-Positions (i) with signing authority over third party funds or assets of $10,000 or more; or (ii) involving a fiduciary responsibility to the employer with the authority to enter financial agreements valued at $10,000 or more;

-Employees required to modify digital security systems established to prevent the unauthorized use of the employer’s or client’s networks or databases.

-Requests for consumer credit information pursuant to a subpoena, court order, or law enforcement investigation.

What this all means, in effect, is that if an employer takes an adverse employment action against an applicant or an employee using or requesting the information protected by Local Law 37, then the applicant or employee would have the right to bring a complaint for discrimination against the employer under New York City Human Rights Law. An adverse employment action includes firing, reducing an employee’s pay, deciding to not hire someone, or otherwise discriminating against an employee or applicant because of his or her credit history. In a private action brought by an aggrieved party, he or she may recover compensatory and punitive damages, and upon prevailing and at the court’s discretion, costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.

Overall, employees and employers alike should seek to understand this new law, respectively to know their rights and to understand their obligations. Employers should work with counsel to review their hiring and other employment practices, including any forms they require applicants or employees to fill out to ensure they are in compliance before the effective date.

This article is not intended to be nor should it be construed as legal advice. Any employee who believes she has suffered a violation under this or any other law, or any employer seeking guidance should speak directly with an attorney.


Recent Posts


Tags

$15 Minimum Wage Worker's Rights Interns as Employees Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Sexual Harassment policy Trade Secrets ACA NYC Salary History Law Start-up Ventures Trade Secrets Act Intellectual Property I-9 Verification Minimum wage Business Attracting Investment Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Firm Announcements stocks Affordable Care Act Employment Law New York Earned Sick Time Act Fair Chance Act Unions Selling Business Employer Mandate AirBnB Technology Wage Theft Protection Act Non-Qualified Stock Options NYC Sexual harrassment law Credit Checks Postnup Corporate Law Employment Contracts Alter-Ego Doctrine Employment Offer/Agreement Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order graduate students Domain Name Lactation Law Health Care Web Domains NQSO Executive Negotiation Paid Family Leave Mandatory Class Action Waivers Department of Labor Fair Work Week Legislation Interview Series U.S. Department of Labor Security Trademark licensing Unionization Arbitration Agreements NY payroll law Internet Law Real Estate Law New Address Negotiating Credit History Public-Sector Union Fees National Labor Relations Board #meToo Fair Labor Standards Act Overtime Exemptions Independent Contractor Transgender protections Employee Salary Histories workplace discrimination Overtime Rules Right to Unionize Immigration Status Nobel Prize Browning-Ferris Case Joint-Employer Relationship Credit Ban the Box Interns Household Employees Privacy Criminal Record Fair Workweek Law Business Law Federal Contractors Hairstyle Discrimination Human Rights Law Apple vs. FBI Executive Severance Facebook Privacy and Litigation Freelance Isn't Free Illegal rentals Payroll Scams National Labor Relations Act Pregnancy Womens Rights New York City Human Rights Law Sexual Harassment NLRB Housing Law Prenup commuter benefits Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council Divorce Newsletter Trademark Law entrepreneur LinkedIn Nanny Audit

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.