News and Articles

New York City Bans Credit Checks By Employers

Yogi Patel - Tuesday, September 08, 2015

On May 6, 2015, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law a general ban on employers from using or requesting the credit history of their employees or prospective employees. Local Law 37, which goes into effect September 3, 2015 as part of New York City Human Rights Law, specifically prohibits most employers with four or more employees from requesting or using an applicant or employees credit history for employment purposes. Employers may also not use the credit history of an applicant or employee to discriminate against her when it comes to hiring, compensation, or the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. There are several exceptions to the prohibition, but employees and applicants should know their rights, and employers should take care to know their obligations as promulgated by the new law.

Local Law 37 adds language to Sections 8-102 and 8-107 of the administrative code of the city of New York, which incorporates the new prohibitions into New York City Human Rights Law and grants victims of credit discrimination its protections. Local Law 37 states:

[I]t shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or agent thereof to request or use for employment purposes the consumer credit history of an applicant for employment or employee, or otherwise discriminate against an applicant or employee with regard to hiring, compensation, or the terms, conditions or privileges of employment based on the consumer credit history of the applicant or employee.

The law defines “consumer credit history” to include “an individual’s credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, or payment history, as indicated by (a) a consumer credit report; (b) credit score; or (c) information an employer obtains directly from the individual” regarding credit accounts, missed payments, collections, bankruptcies, judgments, or liens. Any written report or other communication made by a consumer-reporting agency bearing consumer credit information is considered a consumer credit report under the new law.

Exceptions to the new ban include:

-Jobs in the securities industry;

-Police and peace officers;

-Jobs that require a federal or state security clearance;

-Non-clerical positions that have access to trade secrets, intelligence information, or national security information;

-Positions (i) with signing authority over third party funds or assets of $10,000 or more; or (ii) involving a fiduciary responsibility to the employer with the authority to enter financial agreements valued at $10,000 or more;

-Employees required to modify digital security systems established to prevent the unauthorized use of the employer’s or client’s networks or databases.

-Requests for consumer credit information pursuant to a subpoena, court order, or law enforcement investigation.

What this all means, in effect, is that if an employer takes an adverse employment action against an applicant or an employee using or requesting the information protected by Local Law 37, then the applicant or employee would have the right to bring a complaint for discrimination against the employer under New York City Human Rights Law. An adverse employment action includes firing, reducing an employee’s pay, deciding to not hire someone, or otherwise discriminating against an employee or applicant because of his or her credit history. In a private action brought by an aggrieved party, he or she may recover compensatory and punitive damages, and upon prevailing and at the court’s discretion, costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.

Overall, employees and employers alike should seek to understand this new law, respectively to know their rights and to understand their obligations. Employers should work with counsel to review their hiring and other employment practices, including any forms they require applicants or employees to fill out to ensure they are in compliance before the effective date.

This article is not intended to be nor should it be construed as legal advice. Any employee who believes she has suffered a violation under this or any other law, or any employer seeking guidance should speak directly with an attorney.


Recent Posts


Tags

Domain Name Employment Offer/Agreement New Address Transgender protections Divorce Criminal Record Real Estate Law graduate students Business Law Facebook Privacy and Litigation Fair Workweek Law $15 Minimum Wage LinkedIn Household Employees Minimum wage stocks Security Mandatory Class Action Waivers Trademark Law Lactation Law Overtime Exemptions Housing Law I-9 Verification Credit History Hairstyle Discrimination U.S. Department of Labor Workplace Requirements Health Care New York City Human Rights Law Independent Contractor National Labor Relations Act Interns Employment Law Executive Negotiation Paid Family Leave Landlord-Tenant Law Sexual Harassment Employer Mandate AirBnB Unionization Department of Labor Nanny Audit Immigration Status Corporate Law ACA Newsletter National Labor Relations Board Alter-Ego Doctrine Trademark licensing Public-Sector Union Fees Employee Salary Histories Privacy New York Earned Sick Time Act Federal Overtime Law Trade Secrets Human Rights Law Wage Theft Protection Act Worker's Rights Executive Severance Credit Checks Freelance Isn't Free Non-Qualified Stock Options Technology Selling Business Prenup commuter benefits Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order Right to Unionize Attracting Investment Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Business Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Intellectual Property Nobel Prize Credit #meToo federal Department of Labor Interview Series drug testing Womens Rights Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council NLRB Joint-Employer Relationship Westchester County implementing new leave laws Apple vs. FBI Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws workplace discrimination NQSO Firm Announcements Negotiating NYC Sexual harrassment law NY payroll law Fair Chance Act Postnup Payroll Scams employment discrimination lawsuits Employment Contracts Pregnancy NYC Salary History Law Federal Contractors Fair Play to Pay Act Start-up Ventures Tax-Deferred Savings Affordable Care Act Internet Law Illegal rentals Web Domains Trade Secrets Act sexual harassment training Arbitration Agreements Interns as Employees Sexual Harassment policy EEOC Filing Requirement Unions Browning-Ferris Case Fair Labor Standards Act Overtime Rules Ban the Box marijuana usage Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures NYC Human Right's Law's entrepreneur Fair Work Week Legislation

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.