News and Articles

STATE OF NEW YORK PASSES LEGISLATION IMPOSING FINES FOR THE ADVERTISEMENT OF ILLEGAL APARTMENT RENTALS

Erin Lloyd - Friday, December 16, 2016

Recently, the New York state legislature passed a law that imposes significant fines on those who advertise the renting of apartments in ways that violate certain New York City and state laws. Specifically, any print, television, radio, mail, text, or online advertisement, such as one through Airbnb, which solicits an illegal rental of an entire residential apartment, is punishable by up to $1,000 for a first offence, as much as $5,000 for a second offense, and $7,500 for a third and subsequent violations.

Almost immediately, and as previously promised, Airbnb filed a lawsuit to contest the law, which included asking the Southern District of New York to grant a temporary injunction blocking the enforcement of the new law. Both state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and attorneys for the city agreed not to enforce the law until the request for a preliminary injunction was resolved, but as of the end of November, Airbnb agreed to withdraw its lawsuit against New York State entirely. The company appears poised to continue its battle with New York City, challenging its legal jurisdiction to impose the fines. This battle is sure to come with many more twists and turns in the coming months and we will surely revisit it.

For years now lawmakers and proponents of home sharing, like Airbnb, have been at odds over the legality and regulation of short-term rentals. The combination of rising rents and costs of living, along with the increased convenience of home sharing online through Airbnb has led to a spike in short-term rentals statewide as a means of generating much-needed supplemental income. As the number of short-term rentals has grown exponentially, lawmakers and officials have been scrambling to figure out how to best address the home sharing economy.

On the one hand, many residents feel that they should be allowed to generate extra income through home sharing. Often, monies paid by transient guests is absolutely necessary for tenants to pay their monthly rents. By participating in the home sharing economy, people are able to stay in their homes and make ends meet. Home sharing proponents say that their actions are beneficial overall and claim that the real motivation behind “anti-Airbnb” legislation is to protect the hotel industry, which has been declining with the rise of the share economy.

On the other hand, the government does have an interest in insuring that rentals are safe and properly equipped to handle numerous transient guests. A rotating set of strangers in a residential building can cause a plethora of safety issues and skirts the various tax and other requirements imposed on commercial spaces, such as hotels. When individuals or landlords rent out apartments on a short-term basis with such a frequency that they are essentially operating illegal hotels, this becomes contrary to the residential purpose of the buildings and is more akin to a commercial operation.

Also at issue is the effect that Airbnb and other short-term rental platforms are having on affordable housing as a whole. A 2014 report by the Attorney General’s office revealed that almost three-fourths of local Airbnb advertisements between 2010 and 2014 were illegal hotels that violated state and city laws. What’s more concerning is that even though a small percentage of Airbnb hosts have multiple listings, these hosts account for more than one-third of Airbnb’s business in New York. In effect, this means that at least one-third of all New York listings on Airbnb are being managed not by people renting out part or all of their own homes, but by those who are acting as de facto illegal hotel operators.

Politicians and some tenants’ rights groups argue that this study supports their claims that Airbnb is worsening New York City’s housing crisis by making affordable housing unavailable to its residents. Their argument is that apartments that are occupied entirely or mostly by transient guests by definition reduce the number of apartments available for full-time residents. A reduced housing stock skews the level of demand, which is already out of control, which in turn causes rents to go up. Also, because the amounts transient guests pay per week or per day add up to significantly more than what monthly tenants typically pay, there is a disincentive to lease apartments to permanent residents. The overall effect is skyrocketing rents and fewer affordable apartments for rent for residents.

What makes the most current legislation different is that for the first time, lawmakers are going after the advertisement of an illegal rental as a stand-alone offence – whether or not the apartment is ultimately rented in a manner that violates the law.

We will be following any developments in this case carefully, so check back for updates. Our office can help individuals navigate the laws and regulations specific to your situation. For questions about Airbnb, contact Kyle Carraro (kc@lloydpatel.com) or Erin Lloyd (el@lloydpatel.com).

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Health Care workplace discrimination Sexual Harassment policy LinkedIn Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Overtime Rules Human Rights Law National Labor Relations Act $15 Minimum Wage Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Non-Qualified Stock Options Real Estate Law NYC Human Right's Law's sexual harassment training commuter benefits Employment Contracts entrepreneur NY payroll law Lactation Law Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Fair Work Week Legislation Domain Name employment discrimination lawsuits Newsletter Credit I-9 Verification federal Department of Labor Nanny Audit Business Law Negotiating Divorce Pregnancy AirBnB Ban the Box Alter-Ego Doctrine Westchester County implementing new leave laws Corporate Law marijuana usage Fair Labor Standards Act Paid Family Leave Minimum wage Employer Mandate Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council Illegal rentals graduate students NYC Salary History Law Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order Firm Announcements Federal Contractors Overtime Exemptions New York Earned Sick Time Act Worker's Rights NQSO Selling Business Internet Law Interns Immigration Status Wage Theft Protection Act Web Domains Household Employees Trade Secrets Unions Attracting Investment Prenup Independent Contractor U.S. Department of Labor Security Payroll Scams Interview Series Trade Secrets Act Federal Overtime Law Landlord-Tenant Law Credit History Employee Salary Histories New Address Unionization Workplace Requirements National Labor Relations Board Technology ACA Interns as Employees Executive Negotiation Transgender protections Browning-Ferris Case Employment Law Trademark Law Privacy Start-up Ventures Public-Sector Union Fees Housing Law Fair Workweek Law Hairstyle Discrimination Credit Checks Nobel Prize Womens Rights Department of Labor EEOC Filing Requirement Apple vs. FBI Business Sexual Harassment Tax-Deferred Savings Trademark licensing Affordable Care Act New York City Human Rights Law Fair Chance Act NLRB Employment Offer/Agreement Freelance Isn't Free Joint-Employer Relationship Right to Unionize Arbitration Agreements Facebook Privacy and Litigation Fair Play to Pay Act Criminal Record stocks Postnup #meToo NYC Sexual harrassment law drug testing Mandatory Class Action Waivers Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws Executive Severance Intellectual Property

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.