News and Articles

Legal Update - October 2019 Newsletter

David Lloyd - Wednesday, October 02, 2019

Dear valued clients and supporters: This month's newsletter will focus on: 1) changes to federal overtime rules; 2) tax-deferred savings for business owners; and 3) recent ground breaking legislations in California which could lead to similar changes in New York.

Federal Overtime Law Update

For the first time in over 15 years, the federal Department of Labor increased the minimum salary an employee must be paid in order to be exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Under the old rule, employees had to be paid at least $455 per week in order to be overtime exempt; the new threshold amount is now $684 per week (the equivalent of $35,568 annually). A similar exemption for "highly compensated employees" was raised from $100,000 to $107,432 per year. Under the new rule, employers may now also use certain non-discretionary bonuses, such as commissions, to satisfy up to 10% of the minimum salary threshold. In addition to receiving the increased salary, employees still must meet the "duties" test, meaning they perform certain executive, administrative, professional, or other certain tasks as their main job functions. According to current reports, it is estimate that this change will make 1.3 million current workers who were previously exempt now eligible for overtime pay. As the new rule is set to go into effect on January 1, 2020, employers are encouraged to start taking measures to update their payroll practices as soon as possible.

Tax-Deferred Savings For Business Owners

One of the most misunderstood tools available to business owners are various mechanisms that can potentially defer up to hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes into retirement accounts. In failing to utilize 401k accounts, cash balance plans, and other similar benefits, business owners often overlook and miss out on significant savings for their retirements. If you are a business owner who has yet to take advantage of these tax-saving measures, we recommend you speak to your financial advisor about these plans. To the extent you do not have someone you work with regularly or need a second opinion, we would be happy to connect you with financial professionals with whom we work with.

Ground breaking laws out of California

Earlier this week, California enacted the Fair Play to Pay Act which functionally allows student athletes in California to be paid for their names, images and likenesses despite NCAA regulations prohibiting such compensation. The law, which is scheduled to go into effect in January 2023, does not require schools to pay athletes directly as employees. Instead, it makes it illegal for schools to prevent an athlete from earning money by selling the rights to his or her name, image or likeness to outside bidders. The law also allows college athletes to hire a licensed agent to represent them. Current NCAA rules do not allow a player to accept any compensation related to his or her status as a college athlete from outside sources. While legal challenges to the new law is expected, other states, including New York could likely follow California's lead further upending the NCAA's control on this issue. Another ground breaking law signed last month in California, which could also pave the way for similar legislation in New York (and other states), takes aim at the gig economy. Governor Newsom signed a controversial bill last month known as AB 5, after months of uproar from businesses and gig companies like Uber and Lyft. The bill will require businesses to hire workers as employees, not independent contractors, with some exceptions. Lyft, Uber, and DoorDash have warned that they were each ready to spend $30 million on a ballot initiative to overturn AB 5. California labor unions, which support AB 5, have vowed to fight back.

Readers are encouraged to follow us on Twitter (@lloydpatelllp) and Facebook to receive updates on these and other issues throughout the month.


Legal Update - November 2016 Newsletter

Yogi Patel - Friday, December 16, 2016

Dear valued clients and supporters: This month's newsletter will focus on significant and immediate changes to state and federal employment laws.

 

Update to Federal Law

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), significant changes to the Act were poised to go into effect in a matter of days (Dec 1, 2016). We covered these changes in detail in a previous article, but in short, unless an employee meets certain job performance requirements (the duties test) and earns at least $47,476.00 per year, that employee was going to be entitled to overtime pay for each week they worked in excess of 40 hours. The existing law sets that monetary threshold at $23,600 per year.

However, a federal court in Texas issued a nation-wide injunction yesterday that now temporarily prevents these changes from going into effect on December 1, 2016. Thus, for the time being, the threshold remains at $23,600. Notwithstanding this, employers are still advised to consider whether they are complying with the "duties" test under FLSA - irrespective of the uncertainty regarding the salary level. The "duties" test functionally looks at the day-to-day responsibilities given to an employee. As a general principal under FLSA, an employee who meets the salary level and the salary basis tests is exempt only if s/he also performs exempt job duties. Whether the duties of a particular job qualify as exempt depends on what they truly are - job titles or position descriptions are of limited usefulness in this determination. It is the actual job tasks that must be evaluated, along with how that particular job task "fits" into the employer's overall operations.

 

Update to State Law

As of December 31, 2016 the minimum wage in New York State is set to change. The changes vary depending on the industry, number of employees and location. For example, the minimum wage is different if you are in the fast food industry. It is different if you employee more than 11 people and different again depending on whether your business is located in NYC vs. Nassau/Suffolk County vs. Upstate NY - as in all three have different rates with different effective dates. We covered these changes in detail in a previous newsletter.

Employers should likewise be aware that the Wage Theft Prevention Act (WTPA) requires them to give employees written notification of these pay changes at least seven (7) days in advance of the effective date. Alternatively, an employer may issue a new paystub that contains the notice of wage increase. The written notice must be in English and also in the employee’s primary language if it is not English. Employers must obtain a signed and dated written acknowledgement of the pay change from the employee following the same language guidelines. Employers who violate these requirements may be subject to civil penalties of up to $50 per day, per employee.

Readers are encouraged to follow us on Twitter (@lloydpatelllp) and Facebook to receive updates on these and other issues throughout the month.

 

August 2015 Newsletter

Yogi Patel - Tuesday, August 04, 2015

Dear valued clients and supporters: This month's newsletter will focus on: (1) the EEOC’s declaration that workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation is illegal; (2) the New York State Wage Board's unanimous vote to raise the minimum wage for restaurant workers in the fast food industry to $15 an hour; and (3) the Second Circuit's decision in Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc., providing valuable clarity on the question of whether interns are "employees" -- and therefore entitled to minimum wage and overtime pay under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law.

 

Sexual Orientation and the Workplace
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is at the heart of Federal anti-discrimination law. It prohibits employers with at least fifteen employees from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Sexual orientation discrimination is not expressly included on the list and several federal courts, both at the district court and appellate level, have previously held that the statute’s ban on sex discrimination did not encompass sexual orientation discrimination. But on July 15, 2015, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a ruling finding that sexual orientation discrimination is “associational discrimination on the basis of sex.” Thus, adverse actions taken by employer on account of an employees sexual orientation will now be considered illegal by the EEOC and LGBT employees will have an independent, stand-alone basis to lodge a discrimination complaint before the EEOC under Title VII. It is too early to know how courts will view this new development, and of course most employers are also governed by State and local laws that may already prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.


Minimum Wage and Fast Food Industry Workers
The New York State Wage Board recently recommended raising the minimum wage for restaurant workers in the fast food industry to $15 an hour. In the event the Wage Order is accepted by the Commissioner in its current recommended form, the mandate would apply to all workers in fast-food restaurants that are part of chains with at least 30 outlets. More specifically, the change will apply to workers who cook, clean, serve customers, make deliveries, or perform routine maintenance work as part of their day-to-day duties. The proposed Wage Order, if implemented as is, will apply to all fast food restaurants associated with a chain of 30 or more outlets, irrespective of how many restaurants the individual employer owns. The proposal, once officially published, will then be followed by a 15-day public comment period. Comments will be accepted online and by mail. Based on those comments, the Commissioner may accept, reject or modify the Board's recommendations and file a Wage Order. The Wage Order must be filed within 45 days once the report is filed. The Order is then subject to an additional regulatory process thereafter. We will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates as the process progresses, but if you have specific questions about how this may affect you as an employee or an employer, please contact us.


Interns v. Employees
In Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc., the action was brought by former production interns who worked on the Oscar-winning movie Black Swan, as well as a publicity intern at the company’s New York corporate office, all of whom were unpaid. The interns argued they should have been classified as employees and, thus, should have been compensated for their efforts. The law surrounding this issue has been unclear for several decades due to the guidance offered by the U.S. Department of Labor and conflicting interpretations by courts across the country, making it difficult for an employer to know how to comply. The Second Circuit, which covers New York, observed in Glatt that the question of an intern’s employment status is a highly individualized inquiry and not subject to a bright line rule. To assess whether interns are “trainees” under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) (and therefore “exempt” from overtime and minimum wage rules) or “employees" (and therefore entitled to the laws’ protections), the court adopted what it calls the “primary beneficiary” approach. Under the "primary beneficiary" test, there are at least seven independent factors that should be analyzed under the new approach to determine whether the position is truly an internship or an employment situation. Employers are advised to fully understand their obligations under Glatt prior to hiring an intern.


A more in-depth article on this issue, including the seven factors under the primary beneficiary approach will be posted here on our website shortly and readers are encouraged to follow us on Twitter (@lloydpatelllp) and Facebook to receive updates on this and other issues throughout the month.


Recent Posts


Tags

Domain Name ACA Corporate Law Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws $15 Minimum Wage Fair Chance Act Pregnancy Interview Series Workplace Requirements entrepreneur Department of Labor Business Law New York City Human Rights Law Credit History Postnup Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council Employer Mandate New York Earned Sick Time Act LinkedIn employment discrimination lawsuits Executive Negotiation AirBnB Web Domains Independent Contractor Lactation Law Privacy Paid Family Leave Credit Checks EEOC Filing Requirement Health Care Mandatory Class Action Waivers NYC Salary History Law Employment Contracts Selling Business Employment Law Alter-Ego Doctrine sexual harassment training workplace discrimination Nanny Audit Ban the Box Immigration Status Technology Fair Workweek Law drug testing Hairstyle Discrimination NLRB Employee Salary Histories Internet Law Joint-Employer Relationship marijuana usage Human Rights Law Westchester County implementing new leave laws Federal Overtime Law Non-Qualified Stock Options Illegal rentals Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Facebook Privacy and Litigation Tax-Deferred Savings Executive Severance Freelance Isn't Free Security Housing Law Credit Unionization Attracting Investment Trademark Law Overtime Rules Payroll Scams Start-up Ventures graduate students #meToo Transgender protections National Labor Relations Board Womens Rights I-9 Verification Business Criminal Record Right to Unionize Newsletter Federal Contractors Interns as Employees NQSO Trade Secrets Act Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order Sexual Harassment NYC Sexual harrassment law Wage Theft Protection Act NYC Human Right's Law's commuter benefits Sexual Harassment policy National Labor Relations Act Negotiating stocks Worker's Rights Fair Work Week Legislation Minimum wage U.S. Department of Labor federal Department of Labor Trade Secrets Arbitration Agreements Trademark licensing Unions Interns Landlord-Tenant Law Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Affordable Care Act Public-Sector Union Fees Firm Announcements Intellectual Property NY payroll law Apple vs. FBI Employment Offer/Agreement Real Estate Law New Address Browning-Ferris Case Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Nobel Prize Fair Play to Pay Act Prenup Overtime Exemptions Divorce Household Employees

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.