News and Articles

NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS OFFER CRITICAL INSIGHT INTO DRAFTING EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS

Yogi Patel - Friday, December 16, 2016

The groundbreaking work of Oliver Hart of Harvard University and Bengt Holmstrom of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which includes providing invaluable insight into how employment contracts should be structured, recently earned the two professors the 2016 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science. Hart and Holmstrom’s research offers a variety of theoretical models and frameworks through which they analyze the competing interests of employees, managers, CEOs, shareholders, and others, and attempt to reconcile them via contracts.

Over the past few decades, Homstrom and Hart’s findings have been used to evaluate whether particular contracts accurately measure the performance and value of employees and other agents to companies while offering the right amount of incentive. Specific factors that the research contemplates in its assessment of employment contracts include ownership, control, the measurability of an agent’s performance, risk sharing, and the motivations of the parties involved.

Rather than simply pay an individual a fixed salary or reward a manager for the performance of a company in a vacuum, the professors suggest considering alternative compensation structures and contracting terms, including:

Deferred Compensation

In order to ensure that a company’s interests are aligned with those of an employee, it may make sense to tie an individual’s compensation to performance rather than pay her a set amount. By withholding a portion of an employee’s compensation, the company can provide incentives for the individual to earn the full amount by meeting certain goals. Whether or not this type of arrangement makes sense will depend in great part on the measurability of an employee’s performance and the stability of the business environment.

Performance Evaluation based on the Overall Market

Another metric for evaluating an employee’s value, particularly one who is in a decision-making position, is the overall performance of the company. One common mistake businesses make is setting goals or targets based solely on the absolute performance of the company, rather than taking into account the performance of the company as compared to other similarly situated businesses. If a company does well in a thriving market or suffers during a market collapse, the employee should not be rewarded for good luck or punished for misfortune. A company performing well relative to others is a far superior measurement of employee value.

Designation of a Main Decision-Maker

Most contracts cannot contemplate the exact outcome of every situation that may arise in a given relationship. Companies recognize that it is impossible to list specific instructions for every job responsibility, and this in turn may actually be counterproductive. In such cases, the parties should determine who has the power to decide what to do in situations where they cannot reach an agreement. In this manner, the parties are able to avoid having to anticipate every possible future event while entering into a relationship that allows them to move forward with their main, general purpose, i.e. employment.

While Hart and Holmstrom’s work is highly theoretical and informative, it is essential to use their tools in conjunction with a business’s specific needs. Depending on the business type, number of employees, and variety of other factors, businesses may have widely different terms and compensation structures that work best for them. Notwithstanding this, business owners are advised to consider the research finds of Professor Hart and Holstrom’s when making decisions about their own employees and businesses.

This article was prepared with the assistance of Julie Lee, 3L (CUNY School of Law).

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Divorce stocks Prenup Start-up Ventures Lactation Law Firm Announcements Internet Law Criminal Record Executive Severance Interns Westchester County implementing new leave laws Intellectual Property Minimum wage Transgender protections Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. marijuana usage Employee Salary Histories Employer Mandate Selling Business Sexual Harassment Alter-Ego Doctrine U.S. Department of Labor Nanny Audit Household Employees Fair Play to Pay Act employment discrimination lawsuits Right to Unionize NYC Human Right's Law's NLRB Employment Offer/Agreement Public-Sector Union Fees Fair Workweek Law Worker's Rights Fair Chance Act commuter benefits Nobel Prize Non-Qualified Stock Options Web Domains Interns as Employees Overtime Exemptions NYC Sexual harrassment law EEOC Filing Requirement Employment Contracts Business Law Security Business Ban the Box Apple vs. FBI Credit History Browning-Ferris Case Illegal rentals Facebook Privacy and Litigation Attracting Investment Newsletter Trademark Law NYC Salary History Law Executive Negotiation NQSO Trade Secrets Act National Labor Relations Board ACA Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Technology sexual harassment training graduate students Hairstyle Discrimination workplace discrimination federal Department of Labor Joint-Employer Relationship Interview Series Sexual Harassment policy Corporate Law Landlord-Tenant Law Workplace Requirements Department of Labor Immigration Status Trade Secrets New York City Human Rights Law New Address Tax-Deferred Savings Wage Theft Protection Act Womens Rights Human Rights Law Freelance Isn't Free Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws Federal Contractors Affordable Care Act Housing Law Postnup Federal Overtime Law Payroll Scams Health Care Credit Negotiating Independent Contractor Employment Law Trademark licensing AirBnB Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Fair Work Week Legislation entrepreneur Mandatory Class Action Waivers Fair Labor Standards Act #meToo drug testing Unionization Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order Pregnancy I-9 Verification Overtime Rules Credit Checks Unions Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council National Labor Relations Act Privacy Real Estate Law Paid Family Leave New York Earned Sick Time Act NY payroll law LinkedIn Domain Name $15 Minimum Wage Arbitration Agreements

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.