News and Articles

NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS OFFER CRITICAL INSIGHT INTO DRAFTING EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS

Yogi Patel - Friday, December 16, 2016

The groundbreaking work of Oliver Hart of Harvard University and Bengt Holmstrom of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which includes providing invaluable insight into how employment contracts should be structured, recently earned the two professors the 2016 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science. Hart and Holmstrom’s research offers a variety of theoretical models and frameworks through which they analyze the competing interests of employees, managers, CEOs, shareholders, and others, and attempt to reconcile them via contracts.

Over the past few decades, Homstrom and Hart’s findings have been used to evaluate whether particular contracts accurately measure the performance and value of employees and other agents to companies while offering the right amount of incentive. Specific factors that the research contemplates in its assessment of employment contracts include ownership, control, the measurability of an agent’s performance, risk sharing, and the motivations of the parties involved.

Rather than simply pay an individual a fixed salary or reward a manager for the performance of a company in a vacuum, the professors suggest considering alternative compensation structures and contracting terms, including:

Deferred Compensation

In order to ensure that a company’s interests are aligned with those of an employee, it may make sense to tie an individual’s compensation to performance rather than pay her a set amount. By withholding a portion of an employee’s compensation, the company can provide incentives for the individual to earn the full amount by meeting certain goals. Whether or not this type of arrangement makes sense will depend in great part on the measurability of an employee’s performance and the stability of the business environment.

Performance Evaluation based on the Overall Market

Another metric for evaluating an employee’s value, particularly one who is in a decision-making position, is the overall performance of the company. One common mistake businesses make is setting goals or targets based solely on the absolute performance of the company, rather than taking into account the performance of the company as compared to other similarly situated businesses. If a company does well in a thriving market or suffers during a market collapse, the employee should not be rewarded for good luck or punished for misfortune. A company performing well relative to others is a far superior measurement of employee value.

Designation of a Main Decision-Maker

Most contracts cannot contemplate the exact outcome of every situation that may arise in a given relationship. Companies recognize that it is impossible to list specific instructions for every job responsibility, and this in turn may actually be counterproductive. In such cases, the parties should determine who has the power to decide what to do in situations where they cannot reach an agreement. In this manner, the parties are able to avoid having to anticipate every possible future event while entering into a relationship that allows them to move forward with their main, general purpose, i.e. employment.

While Hart and Holmstrom’s work is highly theoretical and informative, it is essential to use their tools in conjunction with a business’s specific needs. Depending on the business type, number of employees, and variety of other factors, businesses may have widely different terms and compensation structures that work best for them. Notwithstanding this, business owners are advised to consider the research finds of Professor Hart and Holstrom’s when making decisions about their own employees and businesses.

This article was prepared with the assistance of Julie Lee, 3L (CUNY School of Law).

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Non-Qualified Stock Options COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loans Negotiating Corporate Law National Labor Relations Act Criminal Record commuter benefits Interview Series Household Employees #meToo Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Paycheck Protection Program Fair Labor Standards Act Employment Offer/Agreement I-9 Verification New York City Human Rights Law Employee Salary Histories Domain Name Newsletter Westchester County implementing new leave laws Independent Contractor Credit Salary History Inquiries Credit History NYC Sick Leave Law Marijuana Testing Out-of-State LLC Owners Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. entrepreneur Pregnancy Facebook Privacy and Litigation Security Public-Sector Union Fees sexual harassment training Trade Secrets Emergency Economic Injury Grants Fair Chance Act Credit Checks NYC Human Right's Law's Start-up Ventures Executive Severance Tax-Deferred Savings Employer Mandate Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council Sexual Harassment policy Attracting Investment Privacy Unions Lactation Law New York Earned Sick Time Act Sexual Harassment Employment Law Federal Joint Employer Rule Federal Contractors LinkedIn Federal Small Business Assistance Plastic Bag Ban Department of Labor Divorce NYC Sexual harrassment law Alter-Ego Doctrine Web Domains Federal Overtime Law graduate students Internet Law Postnup EEOC Filing Requirement Mandatory Class Action Waivers Affordable Care Act NYC Salary History Law Freelance Isn't Free Apple vs. FBI employment discrimination lawsuits Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws Workplace Requirements Immigration Status Fair Work Week Legislation Trade Secrets Act $15 Minimum Wage U.S. Department of Labor Payroll Scams Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) New Address Trademark Law Transgender protections Paid Family Leave Real Estate Law Joint-Employer Relationship Business Employee Manuals and Policies Overtime Rules Arbitration Agreements Business Law Families First Coronavirus Response Act NY payroll law Housing Law Browning-Ferris Case Illegal rentals Human Rights Law Worker's Rights Right to Unionize Wage Theft Protection Act Interns as Employees ACA Womens Rights Prenup Fair Play to Pay Act Intellectual Property marijuana usage Interns Ban the Box workplace discrimination Nobel Prize Unionization NLRB AirBnB Firm Announcements Selling Business NQSO Landlord-Tenant Law Sexual Harassment and Discrimination In The Workplace Wage and Hour Law Nanny Audit stocks National Labor Relations Board Hairstyle Discrimination federal Department of Labor Employment Contracts drug testing Minimum wage Technology Executive Negotiation Fair Workweek Law Health Care Overtime Exemptions Trademark licensing

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.