News and Articles


Yogi Patel - Friday, December 16, 2016

The groundbreaking work of Oliver Hart of Harvard University and Bengt Holmstrom of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which includes providing invaluable insight into how employment contracts should be structured, recently earned the two professors the 2016 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science. Hart and Holmstrom’s research offers a variety of theoretical models and frameworks through which they analyze the competing interests of employees, managers, CEOs, shareholders, and others, and attempt to reconcile them via contracts.

Over the past few decades, Homstrom and Hart’s findings have been used to evaluate whether particular contracts accurately measure the performance and value of employees and other agents to companies while offering the right amount of incentive. Specific factors that the research contemplates in its assessment of employment contracts include ownership, control, the measurability of an agent’s performance, risk sharing, and the motivations of the parties involved.

Rather than simply pay an individual a fixed salary or reward a manager for the performance of a company in a vacuum, the professors suggest considering alternative compensation structures and contracting terms, including:

Deferred Compensation

In order to ensure that a company’s interests are aligned with those of an employee, it may make sense to tie an individual’s compensation to performance rather than pay her a set amount. By withholding a portion of an employee’s compensation, the company can provide incentives for the individual to earn the full amount by meeting certain goals. Whether or not this type of arrangement makes sense will depend in great part on the measurability of an employee’s performance and the stability of the business environment.

Performance Evaluation based on the Overall Market

Another metric for evaluating an employee’s value, particularly one who is in a decision-making position, is the overall performance of the company. One common mistake businesses make is setting goals or targets based solely on the absolute performance of the company, rather than taking into account the performance of the company as compared to other similarly situated businesses. If a company does well in a thriving market or suffers during a market collapse, the employee should not be rewarded for good luck or punished for misfortune. A company performing well relative to others is a far superior measurement of employee value.

Designation of a Main Decision-Maker

Most contracts cannot contemplate the exact outcome of every situation that may arise in a given relationship. Companies recognize that it is impossible to list specific instructions for every job responsibility, and this in turn may actually be counterproductive. In such cases, the parties should determine who has the power to decide what to do in situations where they cannot reach an agreement. In this manner, the parties are able to avoid having to anticipate every possible future event while entering into a relationship that allows them to move forward with their main, general purpose, i.e. employment.

While Hart and Holmstrom’s work is highly theoretical and informative, it is essential to use their tools in conjunction with a business’s specific needs. Depending on the business type, number of employees, and variety of other factors, businesses may have widely different terms and compensation structures that work best for them. Notwithstanding this, business owners are advised to consider the research finds of Professor Hart and Holstrom’s when making decisions about their own employees and businesses.

This article was prepared with the assistance of Julie Lee, 3L (CUNY School of Law).


Recent Posts


I-9 Verification Privacy Executive Negotiation Credit Checks Workplace Requirements Trade Secrets Act Domain Name Internet Law Salary History Inquiries Right to Unionize Department of Labor Firm Announcements Trademark Law federal Department of Labor Transgender protections New Address Paid Family Leave Payroll Scams Unions Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council Web Domains National Labor Relations Board Criminal Record Hairstyle Discrimination Federal Overtime Law Health Care New York Earned Sick Time Act NQSO Lactation Law Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order NY payroll law #meToo Trade Secrets sexual harassment training NYC Sexual harrassment law NYC Salary History Law Trademark licensing Illegal rentals Interns as Employees Ban the Box Business New York City Human Rights Law Minimum wage Independent Contractor Marijuana Testing Fair Play to Pay Act Employment Contracts Alter-Ego Doctrine marijuana usage graduate students Credit History $15 Minimum Wage Newsletter Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Employer Mandate Security LinkedIn Divorce Real Estate Law Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Arbitration Agreements Worker's Rights Facebook Privacy and Litigation EEOC Filing Requirement Unionization NYC Human Right's Law's Westchester County implementing new leave laws Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws entrepreneur Affordable Care Act Womens Rights Tax-Deferred Savings Public-Sector Union Fees Intellectual Property National Labor Relations Act Credit Fair Labor Standards Act Federal Contractors Interns Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) commuter benefits Sexual Harassment policy Employment Law Corporate Law Technology Sexual Harassment and Discrimination In The Workplace U.S. Department of Labor Selling Business Mandatory Class Action Waivers Nanny Audit Sexual Harassment Freelance Isn't Free Overtime Exemptions employment discrimination lawsuits workplace discrimination Executive Severance Fair Workweek Law Interview Series NLRB drug testing Pregnancy Attracting Investment Start-up Ventures Landlord-Tenant Law Immigration Status Fair Chance Act Employee Salary Histories Plastic Bag Ban Non-Qualified Stock Options AirBnB Overtime Rules Business Law Human Rights Law Negotiating Wage Theft Protection Act Housing Law Employment Offer/Agreement Nobel Prize stocks Postnup Prenup Wage and Hour Law Apple vs. FBI ACA Joint-Employer Relationship Browning-Ferris Case Household Employees Fair Work Week Legislation


EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style


  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text


Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.