News and Articles

NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS OFFER CRITICAL INSIGHT INTO DRAFTING EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS

Yogi Patel - Friday, December 16, 2016

The groundbreaking work of Oliver Hart of Harvard University and Bengt Holmstrom of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which includes providing invaluable insight into how employment contracts should be structured, recently earned the two professors the 2016 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science. Hart and Holmstrom’s research offers a variety of theoretical models and frameworks through which they analyze the competing interests of employees, managers, CEOs, shareholders, and others, and attempt to reconcile them via contracts.

Over the past few decades, Homstrom and Hart’s findings have been used to evaluate whether particular contracts accurately measure the performance and value of employees and other agents to companies while offering the right amount of incentive. Specific factors that the research contemplates in its assessment of employment contracts include ownership, control, the measurability of an agent’s performance, risk sharing, and the motivations of the parties involved.

Rather than simply pay an individual a fixed salary or reward a manager for the performance of a company in a vacuum, the professors suggest considering alternative compensation structures and contracting terms, including:

Deferred Compensation

In order to ensure that a company’s interests are aligned with those of an employee, it may make sense to tie an individual’s compensation to performance rather than pay her a set amount. By withholding a portion of an employee’s compensation, the company can provide incentives for the individual to earn the full amount by meeting certain goals. Whether or not this type of arrangement makes sense will depend in great part on the measurability of an employee’s performance and the stability of the business environment.

Performance Evaluation based on the Overall Market

Another metric for evaluating an employee’s value, particularly one who is in a decision-making position, is the overall performance of the company. One common mistake businesses make is setting goals or targets based solely on the absolute performance of the company, rather than taking into account the performance of the company as compared to other similarly situated businesses. If a company does well in a thriving market or suffers during a market collapse, the employee should not be rewarded for good luck or punished for misfortune. A company performing well relative to others is a far superior measurement of employee value.

Designation of a Main Decision-Maker

Most contracts cannot contemplate the exact outcome of every situation that may arise in a given relationship. Companies recognize that it is impossible to list specific instructions for every job responsibility, and this in turn may actually be counterproductive. In such cases, the parties should determine who has the power to decide what to do in situations where they cannot reach an agreement. In this manner, the parties are able to avoid having to anticipate every possible future event while entering into a relationship that allows them to move forward with their main, general purpose, i.e. employment.

While Hart and Holmstrom’s work is highly theoretical and informative, it is essential to use their tools in conjunction with a business’s specific needs. Depending on the business type, number of employees, and variety of other factors, businesses may have widely different terms and compensation structures that work best for them. Notwithstanding this, business owners are advised to consider the research finds of Professor Hart and Holstrom’s when making decisions about their own employees and businesses.

This article was prepared with the assistance of Julie Lee, 3L (CUNY School of Law).

 


Recent Posts


Tags

Interns as Employees Tax-Deferred Savings Overtime Exemptions Start-up Ventures NYC Sick Leave Law Apple vs. FBI Divorce Economic Injury Disaster Loans entrepreneur Employee Salary Histories Employment Law Fair Labor Standards Act Corporate Law Housing Law Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order sexual harassment training Federal Overtime Law Intellectual Property Webinar Trade Secrets Act Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Prenup $15 Minimum Wage Payroll Scams Firm Announcements Human Rights Law Web Domains Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council Families First Coronavirus Response Act Security Joint-Employer Relationship Pregnancy Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Executive Severance Workplace Requirements Lactation Law Salary History Inquiries Interview Series Health Care Business marijuana usage Real Estate Law Employee Manuals and Policies Ban the Box New York Earned Sick Time Act Fair Chance Act NY payroll law NYC Human Right's Law's Paycheck Protection Program EEOC Filing Requirement Browning-Ferris Case Credit Federal Small Business Assistance Emergency Economic Injury Grants Independent Contractor Trademark licensing AirBnB Arbitration Agreements Facebook Privacy and Litigation Attracting Investment Newsletter Department of Labor Freelance Isn't Free Federal Contractors Immigration Status Fair Work Week Legislation Credit History Fair Play to Pay Act Unions New York City Human Rights Law Marijuana Testing NYC Salary History Law Wage and Hour Law Nobel Prize workplace discrimination graduate students Privacy National Labor Relations Act Womens Rights Trade Secrets Alter-Ego Doctrine Sexual Harassment Public-Sector Union Fees #meToo Business Law Unionization Sexual Harassment policy Credit Checks Executive Negotiation Technology ACA Paid Family Leave LinkedIn Mandatory Class Action Waivers Domain Name Federal Joint Employer Rule Interns Sexual Harassment and Discrimination In The Workplace Illegal rentals stocks Non-Qualified Stock Options Employment Contracts Internet Law Plastic Bag Ban National Labor Relations Board commuter benefits Negotiating Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Employment Offer/Agreement federal Department of Labor Right to Unionize Affordable Care Act Worker's Rights New Address Nanny Audit Household Employees employment discrimination lawsuits Fair Workweek Law Hairstyle Discrimination U.S. Department of Labor NLRB COVID-19 Landlord-Tenant Law Minimum wage NYC Sexual harrassment law Transgender protections I-9 Verification Postnup Overtime Rules Wage Theft Protection Act drug testing Westchester County implementing new leave laws Selling Business NQSO Trademark Law Criminal Record Employer Mandate Out-of-State LLC Owners

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.