News and Articles

Legal Update - April 2017 Newsletter

Yogi Patel - Tuesday, April 04, 2017

Dear valued clients and supporters: This month's newsletter will focus on: (1) challenges to digital arbitration agreements; (2) a payroll scam alert; and (3) the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016.

Digital Arbitration Agreements

When two parties enter into a contract, they may decide to agree to arbitrate, rather than litigate their claims. Parties do this because arbitration can be faster, cheaper, and private. While this practice has long-been commonplace, it is a somewhat recent phenomenon that companies have been seeking to insert arbitration clauses into contracts with their customers on digital platforms (websites). However, in addition to precluding an aggrieved customers access to the courts, an arbitration agreement can also seek to require that each customer bring his or her complaint individually, thereby eliminating the possibility of a class action suit. Because of these potential consequences and nature of consumer agreements, the majority of which are non-negotiable and go unread by the customer, advocates are now asking courts to place limits on arbitration language when it comes to consumer contracts. In one recent decision, a Federal District Court in New York sided with consumer advocates in finding that the arbitration language contained in Uber's customer agreement was unenforceable. The judge reasoned that because the arbitration clause was not readily apparent within the agreement and was not separately agreed to, that customers presumably were not aware of the rights they were waiving. Uber has now appealed to the U.S. Appeals Court for the Second Circuit.
In light of this decision, employers are cautioned to consider the design of their digital platforms, especially if the agreements relate to consumers and contain arbitration clauses.

Payroll Scam Alert

Employers should be on the lookout for an email scam in which hackers, posing as executives, send messages to payroll and HR professionals requesting personal information about employees. The emails can appear to be quite legitimate and are fooling employers into divulging the social security numbers, birth dates, full names, addresses, and W-2 Forms of employees. The information is then used to file fraudulent tax returns and collect refunds. If your company receives any emails requesting W-2 Forms and other personally identifiable information, do not transmit any such data without first confirming verbally with the requestor. If you do fall victim to one of these W-2 phishing scams, you should contact both the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and the IRS so that they can identify suspect filings and implement additional measures to prevent paying out improper refunds.

Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 ("DTSA")

In May 2016, Congress enacted DTSA, which functionally expands the scope of federal intellectual property law. The DTSA provides for a private cause of action in Federal court by an owner of a trade secret that is misappropriated, provided that the trade secret is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce. Under the DTSA, an owner of a trade secret can recover actual damages suffered by the plaintiff, unjust enrichment by wrongdoer, punitive damages and attorney fees. Punitive damages and attorney fees are only available to employers who are trade secret owners who assert a cause of action under the DTSA if they provide notice of immunity for whistleblowers that is also available under the Act to their employees. Furthermore, an action under DTSA can only be maintained if the owner of the trade secret took measures to protect the information they deem to be trade secrets from disclosure in the first place.

In light of this, employers are advised to update their polices and procedures to include reference to the DTSA whistleblower protections available in order to recover punitive damages and attorney fees and to take necessary measures to identify and protect their trade secrets to the extent they have not already.

Readers are encouraged to follow us on Twitter (@lloydpatelllp) and Facebook to receive updates on these and other issues throughout the month.


Recent Posts


Tags

Landlord-Tenant Law Negotiating EEOC Filing Requirement #meToo Newsletter NYC Salary History Law Divorce Department of Labor Real Estate Law Household Employees Fair Labor Standards Act Credit History Federal Overtime Law Business NQSO Sexual Harassment policy Security Apple vs. FBI Attracting Investment Non-Qualified Stock Options entrepreneur Trade Secrets Act ACA Housing Law Internet Law NLRB Executive Negotiation Trademark Law Affordable Care Act Postnup I-9 Verification Employment Contracts Independent Contractor Pregnancy Selling Business Browning-Ferris Case Right to Unionize Employee Salary Histories Credit Intellectual Property National Labor Relations Act Firm Announcements Business Law Payroll Scams Fair Work Week Legislation Web Domains Technology Transgender protections Workplace Requirements Interns as Employees New York City Human Rights Law Fair Play to Pay Act Hairstyle Discrimination Unionization commuter benefits stocks New York Earned Sick Time Act Trade Secrets Employment Offer/Agreement Sexual Harassment Minimum wage Facebook Privacy and Litigation sexual harassment training Westchester County implementing new leave laws NYC Human Right's Law's Interview Series Health Care Tax-Deferred Savings Alter-Ego Doctrine federal Department of Labor Worker's Rights U.S. Department of Labor Start-up Ventures Mandatory Class Action Waivers Freelance Isn't Free $15 Minimum Wage New Address NY payroll law Fair Workweek Law Ban the Box Employment Law Wage Theft Protection Act NYC Sexual harrassment law Employer Mandate Nobel Prize Domain Name Arbitration Agreements Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order marijuana usage Paid Family Leave Lactation Law Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Corporate Law Executive Severance Human Rights Law LinkedIn Illegal rentals Trademark licensing graduate students AirBnB Womens Rights workplace discrimination Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws Federal Contractors Joint-Employer Relationship Credit Checks drug testing National Labor Relations Board Public-Sector Union Fees Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Nanny Audit Fair Chance Act Privacy Interns Overtime Rules Unions Overtime Exemptions employment discrimination lawsuits Immigration Status Prenup Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council Criminal Record

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.