News and Articles

In a Stark Reversal, the NLRB Rules Columbia University Graduate Students May Unionize

Yogi Patel - Wednesday, September 07, 2016

The National Labor Relations Board ruled late last month that student assistants working at private colleges and universities are “employees” under the National Labor Relations Act and can organize and form a union. This reverses the position of the Board, which ruled in 2004 that graduate teaching and research assistants were not employees, reasoning that the students’ relationship with the school was “primarily educational.”

In reversing its 12-year old position in the Brown University case, the NLRB wrote that it wrongly “deprived an entire category of workers the protections of the [National Labor Relations Act], without a convincing justification in either the statutory language or the policies” of the law.

The proper role of graduate students and their contributions outside the classroom has been a source of controversy and debate for nearly two decades, as both private and public institutions of higher education have grown more and more reliant on them for the institutions to operate. Many see increased use of graduate students and low-paid, temporary adjuncts as part of a movement away from full-time professors, a move that has been criticized by educators and students. Students also point out that such work is mandatory as part of many graduate programs, but the pay leaves some of them living in poverty while the time demands prevent them from obtaining other work to supplement their income without compromising their ability to fulfill academic needs.

Schools, on the other hand, argue that unionization could lead to negotiations about inherently educational factors, such as the length of classes, the content of curriculum, or the method or amount of grading.

The Columbia University ruling allows graduate and undergraduate teaching assistants, as well as graduate and departmental research assistants at Columbia University to join Graduate Workers of Columbia-GWC, UAW, but not before the case is reviewed again by an NLRB Manhattan regional director, who must still determine who is eligible to vote in the union election.

Recent Posts


Fair Chance Act Apple vs. FBI ACA Divorce Unionization Interns Selling Business Employment Offer/Agreement Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council LinkedIn New York City Human Rights Law National Labor Relations Board Household Employees Health Care Right to Unionize Paid Family Leave Business Law Fair Workweek Law Minimum wage Employee Salary Histories Hairstyle Discrimination Housing Law Illegal rentals I-9 Verification Trade Secrets Act Payroll Scams Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order Trade Secrets Privacy Human Rights Law #meToo Employment Contracts Prenup Executive Severance Alter-Ego Doctrine Freelance Isn't Free Joint-Employer Relationship Arbitration Agreements Womens Rights Sexual Harassment policy commuter benefits Real Estate Law Postnup Federal Contractors Fair Labor Standards Act Transgender protections NLRB Non-Qualified Stock Options Corporate Law Overtime Exemptions Credit Department of Labor Wage Theft Protection Act National Labor Relations Act New Address Facebook Privacy and Litigation Negotiating NYC Salary History Law graduate students Credit Checks NQSO Ban the Box Firm Announcements Affordable Care Act Employer Mandate Credit History Sexual Harassment NY payroll law Technology Start-up Ventures stocks Security Newsletter Web Domains Nobel Prize Employment Law New York Earned Sick Time Act Browning-Ferris Case Executive Negotiation Pregnancy workplace discrimination Intellectual Property entrepreneur AirBnB Public-Sector Union Fees NYC Sexual harrassment law Fair Work Week Legislation Business U.S. Department of Labor Interns as Employees Overtime Rules Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Trademark licensing Independent Contractor Attracting Investment Immigration Status Trademark Law Unions Lactation Law Domain Name Mandatory Class Action Waivers Interview Series Nanny Audit Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Criminal Record Worker's Rights Internet Law $15 Minimum Wage


EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style


  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text


Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.