News and Articles

In a Stark Reversal, the NLRB Rules Columbia University Graduate Students May Unionize

Yogi Patel - Wednesday, September 07, 2016

The National Labor Relations Board ruled late last month that student assistants working at private colleges and universities are “employees” under the National Labor Relations Act and can organize and form a union. This reverses the position of the Board, which ruled in 2004 that graduate teaching and research assistants were not employees, reasoning that the students’ relationship with the school was “primarily educational.”

In reversing its 12-year old position in the Brown University case, the NLRB wrote that it wrongly “deprived an entire category of workers the protections of the [National Labor Relations Act], without a convincing justification in either the statutory language or the policies” of the law.

The proper role of graduate students and their contributions outside the classroom has been a source of controversy and debate for nearly two decades, as both private and public institutions of higher education have grown more and more reliant on them for the institutions to operate. Many see increased use of graduate students and low-paid, temporary adjuncts as part of a movement away from full-time professors, a move that has been criticized by educators and students. Students also point out that such work is mandatory as part of many graduate programs, but the pay leaves some of them living in poverty while the time demands prevent them from obtaining other work to supplement their income without compromising their ability to fulfill academic needs.

Schools, on the other hand, argue that unionization could lead to negotiations about inherently educational factors, such as the length of classes, the content of curriculum, or the method or amount of grading.

The Columbia University ruling allows graduate and undergraduate teaching assistants, as well as graduate and departmental research assistants at Columbia University to join Graduate Workers of Columbia-GWC, UAW, but not before the case is reviewed again by an NLRB Manhattan regional director, who must still determine who is eligible to vote in the union election.


Recent Posts


Tags

Intellectual Property Sexual Harassment graduate students Alter-Ego Doctrine Nanny Audit Security National Labor Relations Board Technology Minimum wage AirBnB NYC Sexual harrassment law Interview Series Non-Qualified Stock Options ACA Privacy Executive Severance Hairstyle Discrimination Apple vs. FBI Newsletter Prenup Interns entrepreneur Attracting Investment Credit Browning-Ferris Case Payroll Scams Independent Contractor Pregnancy Lactation Law New York Earned Sick Time Act Arbitration Agreements LinkedIn Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Employment Contracts Household Employees U.S. Department of Labor NQSO Fair Work Week Legislation Affordable Care Act Domain Name NLRB Fair Chance Act Overtime Rules workplace discrimination Employment Law sexual harassment training Fair Pay and Safe Workplace Executive Order Westchester Safe and Sick Time Laws Selling Business Trademark Law New York City Human Rights Law Overtime Exemptions Worker's Rights Divorce Joint-Employer Relationship Department of Labor NYC Salary History Law Employer Mandate Postnup Housing Law Womens Rights Paid Family Leave Right to Unionize Web Domains Fair Workweek Law Negotiating Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council Westchester County implementing new leave laws NYC Human Right's Law's Internet Law Trademark licensing Nobel Prize NY payroll law Executive Negotiation Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Workplace Requirements Corporate Law #meToo Federal Contractors Criminal Record Firm Announcements New Address Start-up Ventures Real Estate Law Fair Labor Standards Act Trade Secrets Act Human Rights Law Business Law Illegal rentals Immigration Status EEOC Filing Requirement Public-Sector Union Fees National Labor Relations Act Health Care Facebook Privacy and Litigation marijuana usage Trade Secrets Credit Checks Credit History Unionization Business Employment Offer/Agreement Wage Theft Protection Act commuter benefits $15 Minimum Wage Freelance Isn't Free Employee Salary Histories Interns as Employees I-9 Verification drug testing Ban the Box Mandatory Class Action Waivers Transgender protections stocks Sexual Harassment policy Unions employment discrimination lawsuits

Archive

EDIT - blog-container - This controls the styles for the headings

EDIT - BlogTagCloud - Font style

description

  • EDIT  - post-body - Font style

EDIT - side-panel - This is the colour of the sidebar headings

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Description

Snap | BC Module - Blog - Blog Title

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Date - This is the date box style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Post Title - Heading style

EDIT  - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Content - Font style

EDIT - Snap | BC Module - Blog - Sidebar Title - Heading style

latest blog title snap text

 

Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is or should be construed as legal advice.
An attorney-client relationship does not exist with our firm unless a signed
retainer agreement is executed, and we do not offer legal advice through
this site or any of the content located on it. For legal advice for your
particular circumstances, please contact us directly.